I've put my games - Steam and Epic - into a 2.5 Samsung Evo 860 USB-C enclosure running through a USB A. So here's what I've done and what I still am leaning towards. I would highly suggest looking into something like the "toram" option The chances are very very low that you would see good performance using a USB drive as the OS drive without loading everything into RAM. Again, it depends on how your mother board is setup and how it's handling USB traffic and if your USB drive is good at random reads.ĮDIT: To be clear here. Would they run better than if they were on the 5400 rpm drive. This is a semi common way to setup a Raspberry Pi in order to help preserve the integrity of the sd cards and it's data.įinally, at 256GB, I can store a few Steam games on it. For example, your distro could be setup with a UnionFS like setup that uses your RAM as the main writing area and it syncs to your drive when you shutdown. Again, this depends on the quality of the drive and how your distro is setup. Is there any issue I should be mindful of in terms of accelerating its, uh, "wear and tear."ĭon't put your swap file or your /var directory on it as it will cause significant writes to occur and and degrade your flash memory faster. Theoretically, yes, but this could end up being slower depending on the quality of the USB drive and how your motherboard is handling USB (for example, if the NIC is also running through the USB like on the older Raspberry Pi models) and how good your motherboard is at random reads.Ĭhances are really high that the random reads will be really bad unless you bought a high end USB drive though.Īlthough the USB stick will degrade it will be at least a couple of years. Will booting into Linux from the USB (supposedly with 300MB transfer speed) through a USB-C port (USB 3.1 gen 1) be significantly faster than a 5400rpm HD dual boot. Get rid of the 5400RPM hard drive and replace it with a suitable SATA SSD, and dual-boot off that one drive. Running a desktop OS off a USB flash drive as opposed to a portable SSD will kill the flash drive eventually, provided you don't kill it sooner out of frustration with poor performance and the occasional data corruption that may or may not be catastrophic. They usually are made with a lower grade of flash memory (more defects, less spare area, more likely to wear out sooner), and the controllers are not able to offer the same level of performance (especially for random IO). Typical USB flash drives are really not suitable for the use case you describe. Portable SSDs are fine for your use case, though USB is a less efficient storage interface than SATA or NVMe, so there's a bit of extra CPU overhead. There's a big difference between typical USB flash drives (including all the physically tiny ones) and portable SSDs, which use SATA or NVMe SSDs internally with a bridge chip to make them accessible over USB. Raspberry Foundation via various vendors.More general: /r/buildapc or /r/hardware. If you notice any problems or think a comment/submission was wrongfully removed, message the mods Browse Categories
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |